Section 8 Vouchers by State: Households and Rates Compared
The Housing Choice Voucher program, commonly known as Section 8, helps low-income households pay rent in privately owned housing. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) counts the households that use a voucher in each state.1
This analysis compares the 50 states and the District of Columbia by the number of voucher households and by the number per 1,000 renter households. The figures describe households that already hold a voucher, not the households that qualify or the households on a waiting list.
Key findings
- 2,301,736 households in the 50 states and the District of Columbia used a Housing Choice Voucher on December 31, 2025. California, New York and Texas had the most, with 316,630, 247,467 and 150,345 households. #
- The ten states with the most voucher households account for 58% of all voucher households, and California alone accounts for 14%. The median state has 27,752 voucher households, and nine states have fewer than 10,000. #
- Nationally, there are 50 voucher households for every 1,000 renter households, and the median state has 50. Vermont, Massachusetts and Louisiana have the highest rates, at 96, 87 and 84, and Arizona, Kansas and Idaho have the lowest, at 24, 28 and 32. #
- Rank by household count and rank by rate differ. Of the ten states with the most voucher households, two are also among the ten with the highest rate. California ranks 1st by households and 21st by rate, New York ranks 2nd by households and 8th by rate and Texas ranks 3rd by households and 45th by rate. #
- The average monthly federal payment per voucher household ranges from $586 in Arkansas to $1,780 in California, with a median of $926. #
- The average monthly rent and utility contribution of a voucher household ranges from $346 in the District of Columbia to $625 in Hawaii, with a median of $451. #
- Households admitted to the program had waited 23 months on average in the median state, from 10 months in West Virginia and Wyoming to 62 months in Maryland. Seven states average 36 months or more: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island. The figure covers households that were admitted and excludes agencies that do not report waiting list dates, so it does not predict the wait of a new applicant. Alaska did not report the figure. #
- Households headed by a female with children are 35% of voucher households in the median state, from 17% in Oregon to 53% in Alabama. #
Each state is counted once, regardless of population. A state with many renters has more voucher households, so the rate in finding 3 is the fairer comparison of program size.
Highest and lowest voucher rates
Voucher households per 1,000 renter households, three highest and three lowest states
The rate divides voucher households by renter-occupied households. It describes the size of the program relative to the number of renters, and it does not give the chance that a household receives a voucher. Many renters do not qualify, and waiting lists may be closed.
All states, highest rate first
| Rank | State | Rate | Households | Size | Payment | Wait |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vermont | 96 | 7,308 | 44 | $1,069 | 17 |
| 2 | Massachusetts | 87 | 92,714 | 6 | $1,735 | 31 |
| 3 | Louisiana | 84 | 49,303 | 16 | $906 | 28 |
| 4 | Connecticut | 82 | 39,936 | 17 | $1,435 | 41 |
| 5 | West Virginia | 77 | 13,890 | 34 | $590 | 10 |
| 6 | Maine | 74 | 12,080 | 36 | $1,077 | 34 |
| 7 | District of Columbia | 70 | 13,584 | 35 | $1,514 | 15 |
| 8 | New York | 69 | 247,467 | 2 | $1,643 | 40 |
| 9 | Maryland | 69 | 53,027 | 14 | $1,476 | 62 |
| 10 | Mississippi | 69 | 23,774 | 28 | $733 | 26 |
| 11 | New Hampshire | 66 | 10,286 | 42 | $754 | 52 |
| 12 | New Jersey | 63 | 80,124 | 8 | $1,346 | 39 |
| 13 | Hawaii | 61 | 11,567 | 38 | $1,685 | 27 |
| 14 | Illinois | 61 | 100,284 | 5 | $1,150 | 22 |
| 15 | Oregon | 58 | 37,324 | 19 | $926 | 33 |
| 16 | Alabama | 57 | 33,845 | 22 | $838 | 22 |
| 17 | Ohio | 56 | 88,906 | 7 | $848 | 26 |
| 18 | Rhode Island | 56 | 9,154 | 43 | $1,352 | 41 |
| 19 | Kentucky | 55 | 32,439 | 25 | $763 | 13 |
| 20 | Arkansas | 53 | 21,638 | 31 | $586 | 16 |
| 21 | California | 52 | 316,630 | 1 | $1,780 | 26 |
| 22 | North Dakota | 51 | 6,976 | 45 | $643 | 11 |
| 23 | Washington | 51 | 60,329 | 10 | $1,241 | 14 |
| 24 | Michigan | 51 | 55,684 | 11 | $858 | 31 |
| 25 | Minnesota | 50 | 33,538 | 23 | $1,110 | 25 |
| 26 | Iowa | 50 | 19,178 | 32 | $595 | 24 |
| 27 | Pennsylvania | 47 | 78,218 | 9 | $1,012 | 23 |
| 28 | Indiana | 47 | 38,351 | 18 | $734 | 21 |
| 29 | Alaska | 47 | 4,272 | 50 | $830 | Not reported |
| 30 | Missouri | 45 | 36,468 | 20 | $814 | 33 |
| 31 | Virginia | 45 | 50,810 | 15 | $1,086 | 27 |
| 32 | New Mexico | 45 | 11,108 | 39 | $795 | 17 |
| 33 | South Dakota | 44 | 5,318 | 48 | $662 | 15 |
| 34 | Oklahoma | 43 | 23,586 | 29 | $745 | 16 |
| 35 | Delaware | 42 | 4,510 | 49 | $1,073 | 43 |
| 36 | South Carolina | 42 | 25,614 | 27 | $810 | 17 |
| 37 | Nebraska | 40 | 11,083 | 40 | $758 | 19 |
| 38 | Colorado | 39 | 33,189 | 24 | $1,441 | 19 |
| 39 | Montana | 39 | 5,743 | 47 | $877 | 21 |
| 40 | Georgia | 38 | 54,636 | 13 | $1,213 | 22 |
| 41 | Florida | 38 | 109,826 | 4 | $1,644 | 32 |
| 42 | North Carolina | 37 | 54,738 | 12 | $844 | 21 |
| 43 | Tennessee | 35 | 34,404 | 21 | $1,015 | 24 |
| 44 | Wyoming | 35 | 2,532 | 51 | $693 | 10 |
| 45 | Texas | 35 | 150,345 | 3 | $1,154 | 21 |
| 46 | Wisconsin | 34 | 27,752 | 26 | $740 | 21 |
| 47 | Utah | 32 | 11,662 | 37 | $871 | 25 |
| 48 | Nevada | 32 | 15,671 | 33 | $1,321 | 23 |
| 49 | Idaho | 32 | 6,702 | 46 | $946 | 20 |
| 50 | Kansas | 28 | 10,705 | 41 | $715 | 19 |
| 51 | Arizona | 24 | 23,508 | 30 | $1,381 | 25 |
- Rank: position by rate, highest first.
- Rate: voucher households per 1,000 renter households.
- Households: occupied voucher units under contract.
- Size: position by number of voucher households, highest first.
- Payment: average monthly federal payment per household, including an administrative amount.
- Wait: average months on the waiting list before admission, excluding agencies that do not report dates.
Each state links to its state page. For the count of voucher households ranked from highest to lowest, with average income and rent paid, see Section 8 vouchers by state. To check an income limit and Fair Market Rent for a county, use the Section 8 calculator.
FAQ
Which states have the most Section 8 voucher households?
2,301,736 households in the 50 states and the District of Columbia used a Housing Choice Voucher on December 31, 2025. California, New York and Texas had the most, with 316,630, 247,467 and 150,345 households. The ten states with the most voucher households account for 58% of all voucher households, and California alone accounts for 14%. The median state has 27,752 voucher households, and nine states have fewer than 10,000. #
Which states have the most vouchers compared with the number of renters?
Nationally, there are 50 voucher households for every 1,000 renter households, and the median state has 50. Vermont, Massachusetts and Louisiana have the highest rates, at 96, 87 and 84, and Arizona, Kansas and Idaho have the lowest, at 24, 28 and 32. Rank by household count and rank by rate differ. Of the ten states with the most voucher households, two are also among the ten with the highest rate. California ranks 1st by households and 21st by rate, New York ranks 2nd by households and 8th by rate and Texas ranks 3rd by households and 45th by rate. #
How long do households wait for a Section 8 voucher?
Households admitted to the program had waited 23 months on average in the median state, from 10 months in West Virginia and Wyoming to 62 months in Maryland. Seven states average 36 months or more: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island. The figure covers households that were admitted and excludes agencies that do not report waiting list dates, so it does not predict the wait of a new applicant. Alaska did not report the figure. #
Suggested citation
Single Mother Guide. “Section 8 Vouchers by State: Households and Rates Compared.” November 2026. https://singlemotherguide.com/research/section-8-vouchers
A plain-text copy of this analysis is available as Markdown.
Methodology and definitions
The figures above combine the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Picture of Subsidized Households state file for December 31, 2025 with the Census Bureau’s 2024 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year estimates of renter households. Rates and shares are calculated from those two sources.
What does this analysis measure?
A voucher household is an occupied Housing Choice Voucher unit under contract on December 31, 2025. The count includes tenant-based and project-based vouchers. It does not include households that qualify for a voucher or households on a waiting list.
The rate is the number of voucher households per 1,000 renter households. It describes the size of the program relative to the number of renters. It does not give the chance that a household receives a voucher.
Population covered by each statistic
The statistics on this page describe different groups, depending on how each source defines them. Percentages and counts from different rows are not directly comparable.
| Statistic | Group measured | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Voucher households | Occupied Housing Choice Voucher units under contract, tenant-based and project-based, in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands are excluded | HUD, Picture of Subsidized Households, December 31, 2025 |
| Renter households | Renter-occupied housing units in each state | ACS 2024, table B25003 |
| Voucher households per 1,000 renter households | Voucher households divided by renter households, multiplied by 1,000 | Calculated from the two sources above |
| Average HUD payment | Average monthly federal payment per voucher household, including an administrative amount | HUD, Picture of Subsidized Households, December 31, 2025 |
| Average rent paid by household | Average monthly household contribution toward rent and utilities | HUD, Picture of Subsidized Households, December 31, 2025 |
| Average months on waiting list | Average time between joining a waiting list and admission, excluding agencies that do not report waiting list dates | HUD, Picture of Subsidized Households, December 31, 2025 |
| Female-headed households with children | Share of voucher households headed by a female with children | HUD, Picture of Subsidized Households, December 31, 2025 |
Field definitions follow Data Dictionary for Picture of Subsidized Households: 2025.
Statistical uncertainty
The HUD figures are administrative records, not survey estimates. The ACS renter counts are survey estimates with a margin of error, which matters most for states with few renters.
The two sources are about a year apart, so a rate is an approximation. A finding is omitted when fewer than 20 jurisdictions support it.
Interpreting the numbers
The rates describe the size of the program relative to the number of renters. They do not measure how many households qualify, how many are on waiting lists, or the chance that a household receives a voucher.
The waiting time covers households that were admitted. It does not predict the wait of a new applicant.
Updates and rounding
HUD publishes new data once a year, and the figures are refreshed after each release. Counts are whole households, rates are rounded to the nearest whole number per 1,000 renter households, and shares are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
Footnotes
-
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Picture of Subsidized Households, state data for December 31, 2025. ↩
About this information
SingleMotherGuide.com is an independent state-by-state reference guide and is not affiliated with any government agency. Program amounts and income limits are compiled from official federal and state sources, which are cited on the page, and are reviewed periodically and updated as those sources change.
The information is provided for general guidance and is not legal or financial advice. The administering agency makes the final determination of eligibility and benefit amounts. To report an error, please contact us.
Data freshness
Figures on this page are compiled from the public sources cited above and may change; refer to the cited sources for the most current information.
- Last updated
- Updated by
- Ada Hu